Distributed smart grids and energy operations
Modern power management systems face uniquely high-stakes trade-offs. The Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow (MO-OPF) model mathematically formulates the challenges of simultaneously minimizing the economic costs of power generation, restricting environmental emission rates, and regulating line transmission losses or voltage deviations.
For traditional generators, the expected fuel and operating cost across an interconnected network is naturally modeled as a strongly convex quadratic function of power output \(P_i\):
Equally, in multi-agent microgrids integrating photovoltaic systems (PV), energy storage batteries, and Electric Vehicle (EV) charging stations, researchers utilize game-theoretic models to continuously distribute power allocations. To stabilize the energy demand across multiple EV chargers, the network actively minimizes the demand mismatch penalty against a target demand \(p_k^*\) [YYLM21]. Evaluated as an independent utility function for each node \(l\), this forms:
From a mathematical perspective, modifying the power allocations to maximize the utility \(u_l\) is mathematically identical to minimizing the positive-definite squared deviation between allocated and requested charge. Because the error metrics natively employ bounded quadratic structures (with the positive coefficient \(a_i > 0\)), the resulting system cost matrix is structurally strongly convex across the sub-groups.
These strongly convex definitions enable massive decentralized networking algorithms—like accelerated Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM)—to secure linear convergence uniformly across geographically vast nodes.
Additionally, as weather profiles and market electricity pricing constantly fluctuate, network operators must instantaneously reroute their balance policies. Equipping a distributed smart grid operator with a pre-computed Bézier simplex mapping allows the grid to frictionlessly evaluate these high-dimensional, competitive variables in real-time, executing continuous equilibrium adjustments across millions of endpoints securely.
References
El Houcine Bergou, Youssef Diouane, and Vyacheslav Kungurtsev. Complexity iteration analysis for strongly convex multi-objective optimization using a newton path-following procedure. Optimization Letters, 15:1215–1227, 2021. doi:10.1007/s11590-020-01623-x.
Henri Bonnel and Corinne Schneider. Post-pareto analysis and a new algorithm for the optimal parameter tuning of the elastic net. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 183(3):993–1027, 2019. doi:10.1007/s10957-019-01592-x.
S Breedveld, P Storchi, M Keijzer, A Heemink, and B Heijmen. A novel approach to multi-criteria inverse planning for imrt. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2007.
Olivier de Weck and Il Yong Kim. Adaptive weighted sum method for multiobjective optimization. Submitted to Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization for Review.
Jörg Fliege, L M Graña Drummond, and Benar Fux Svaiter. Newton's method for multiobjective optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 20(2):602–626, 2009. doi:10.1137/08071692X.
Naoki Hamada. 多目的最適化の解集合のトポロジーの検定法 (statistical test for the topology of solution sets in multi-objective optimization). In 日本応用数理学会2020年度年会講演予稿集 (Proceedings of the JSIAM Annual Meeting 2020). 2020.
Naoki Hamada and Keisuke Goto. Data-driven analysis of pareto set topology. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, 657–664. 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3205455.3205613.
Naoki Hamada, Kenta Hayano, Shunsuke Ichiki, Yutaro Kabata, and Hiroshi Teramoto. Topology of pareto sets of strongly convex problems. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 30(3):2659–2686, 2020. doi:10.1137/19M1264175.
Per Christian Hansen and Dianne Prost O'Leary. The use of the l-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 14(6):1487–1503, 1993. doi:10.1137/0914086.
Ken Kobayashi, Naoki Hamada, Akiyoshi Sannai, Aiko Tanaka, Kenichi Bannai, and Masashi Sugiyama. Bézier simplex fitting: describing pareto fronts of simplicial problems with small samples in multi-objective optimization. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 33, 2304–2313. 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012304.
Suyun Liu and Luís N Vicente. The stochastic multi-gradient algorithm for multi-objective optimization and its application to supervised machine learning. Annals of Operations Research, 339(3):1119–1148, 2024. doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04033-z.
Harry Markowitz. Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1):77–91, 1952. doi:10.2307/2975974.
Yuto Mizota, Naoki Hamada, and Shunsuke Ichiki. All unconstrained strongly convex problems are weakly simplicial. 2021. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.12704, arXiv:2106.12704.
Houduo Qi. Optimal portfolio selections via l1,2-norm regularization. URL: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/451606/1/mvpl12_for_PURE.pdf.
Robert Tibshirani, Michael Saunders, Saharon Rosset, Ji Zhu, and Keith Knight. Sparsity and smoothness via the fused lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 67(1):91–108, 2005.
Dongxiang Yan, He Yin, Tao Li, and Chengbin Ma. A two-stage scheme for both power allocation and ev charging coordination in a grid tied pv-battery charging station. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2021. doi:10.1109/TII.2021.3054417.
Ming Yuan and Yi Lin. Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 68(1):49–67, 2006.